"Never go to War .... " hey hey ... don't think i became a philanthropist... let me complete ... " Never go to war... Especially with yourself ..."
This is a weird statement, i felt the same way u feel when i heard it for the first time, which eventually became sensible. A few of you might know this already ... Yes i heard it from the movie "Lord of war
" ... mm an interesting movie... Chal ... I am not going to discuss about the movie or the plot here cos there are other places to do them...
If some one thinks and feels that he or she is born for it and still love to do anything for getting their hands on it... thats priority .... and this priority becomes a part of their own biology ... and thats the only thing in the world they themselves shouldn't go to war at ... Its not that you cannot win the war... but the losses will be huge .. If you expect to conquer something by that war, i guess u will loose yourself winning that war. So why to hate something which was your priority just because of something else became more important. I have seen and heard of some victorious wars, which was on the just waged because of their friends, family (both existing and to be), society and sometimes money and sometimes power. These things made me think ... if he can wage that war ... he has priorities which tends to evolve... If at all that was a previous priority or a dead priority it comes back from its roots deep inside yourself... Then it wins u back, kicking u back to square one of your war.. dare to wage the war again .... :)
You can have priorities which are totally controversial ... but shouldn't be controversial with your other priorities... And i like to remind you again ... Don't go to war ... against yourself.
Building ... sustainability in its primary stages .. i think i will become an agriculturist soon... cool isn't it.. !
My friend's grandma said about 5 generations before her ... and she was discussing their greatness and plunders. She was predicting that a cycle of 7 generations will have all status and categories of people in a single family. To be more specific, the same family will be honored / respected and treated like kings once in the 7 generations. In another one they will be almost cared to nothing. She was not clear of the number of kids at each level of family tree, but she knew about 3 generations before her and 2 generations after her which ranged for about 300 years or even more. We could even say she was a walking historical reference for the period from around 1700 till now . I believe her hypothesis which is ' there will be a top class generation will then degrade gradually and become insignificant and then grow from there to the most powerfully known and this happens in 7 generations' .. She said before that was history for her .. :) ... 
... One of the historian was asked about the English invasions and colonies.. he said it was too early to discuss about the consequences of their invasion... !!! He was backing with some events which were related to events relevant to the first trade route, which was used during 206 BC – 220 BC (Silk route
.. i am not sure about the years .. may be built during this 14 yrs). I couldn't even guess what his meaning for the term History meant for him ... :P 
And during Bush administration america was having many treaties with other countries. America - Japan relations were strong now during the Iraq reconstruction, Japanese troops were working side by side with the American troops, who apparently nuked 2 of their most prosperous cities just 65 years back in WW2 
... :-O 
176,379 
